case western reserve university law school ranking Things To Know Before You Buy
case western reserve university law school ranking Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
As the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or girl don't approve of this sort of inter-caste or get more info interreligious marriage the utmost they could do if they will Slice off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is usually a law that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment too. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the obvious negation with the legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. Should the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the law. This example of case regulation refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, within the same level.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.